Scientists have discovered a tiny, bag-like prehistoric creature that lived 540 million years ago and could be an ancient ancestor of ours.
The prehistoric creature, Saccorhytus, was discovered in microfossils found in rock in Shaanxi province in central China.
It’s believed that this new species is the most primitive example of a deuterostome, a category in biology that includes many sub-groups, including vertebrates such as ourselves.
« Frankly, it doesn’t look like anything very exciting; it looks like a tiny dot, a bit smaller than a grain of rice. But in the electron microscope, it’s just eye-popping, » Simon Conway Morris, a professor and fellow of St. John’s College, Cambridge, who authored the paper, told CBC News.
Clues linking to humans
The fossils, which were exquisitely preserved, were found in limestone — three tonnes of it — that was broken down into very small pieces allowing researchers to study them under electron microscopes.
« The sheer fidelity of the preservation, the quality of the preservation is astonishing, » Morris said.
Saccorhytus — which means « wrinkled bag » — was just about one millimetre in size with an elliptical body and large mouth.
One of the things that deuterostomes share is gill slits, and the researchers found that the Saccorhytus had small conical features believed to be the precursors to gills. That’s where excess water — and possibly waste — was expelled. The researchers couldn’t find any sign the creature had an anus.
The molecular clock
Scientists look at genetic information of related species to see when they diverged. They believe that the process occurs in a clock-like fashion. However, there isn’t much evidence for the time period before the Saccorhytus.
The finding provides some support to the theory of the molecular clock: evidence of creatures that existed earlier and were smaller than the Saccorhytus may never be found.
Morris said this discovery doesn’t mean they’ve found our earliest human ancestor, but it is still exciting.
« This is our best glimpse of what we would regard as not the first deuterostome but one of the early examples, » he said.
The findings were published in the journal Nature.